Legal Opinion
Straus v. Kazemekas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1924PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
In the complaint the plaintiff alleged a contract with the defendant in the following terms: “On November 13th, 1918, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to sell, and the defendant agreed to buy, 20,000 Russian rubles at $22.75 per hundred rubles on ‘future delivery,’ same to be delivered as soon as practicable after importation of Russian currency is permitted, said contract also requiring the defendant to pay 50% of the purchase price as a deposit upon entering into the contract, and the balance upon being notified that the said rubles were ready…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- School District No. 1 v. DauchySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Cohen v. . Berlin Jones Envelope Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Kinzer Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1910
- Mahaska County State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
3Cited by37 opinions
- Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Connecticut Union of Telephone Workers, Inc. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Commerce Trust Company v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.