Legal Opinion

Drake v. Donegal Mutual Insurance

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-102 ERIEPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS AND OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff has sued both defendants under diversity jurisdiction claiming that she is entitled to insurance coverage for her injuries from one or the other. The issue of coverage was submitted for trial by the court, and the court makes the following findings.

Plaintiff was a pedestrian who was struck by an automobile covered for liability purposes by Donegal Mutual Insurance Company under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Insurance Act, 40 P.S. 1009.101 et seq. Plaintiff owns no vehicle of her own and thus is without no-fault “security” of her own.

Donegal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoff v. HoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gibson v. CallaghanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Pierce v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Boswell v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API