Legal Opinion

Donegal Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1988No. 3084 and 3235PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether an uninsured pedestrian, who has been struck by an insured vehicle, is a member of the household of a cousin from whom the pedestrian rented a room in order to have a place to stay when he was in Harrisburg. This issue must be determined in order to decide whether it is the insurer of the offending motor vehicle or the insurer of the cousin’s non-involved vehicle which is liable for basic loss benefits under the now repealed No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 Before reaching this issue, however, we must first determine whether the trial…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Garrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. In Re the Estate of McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. A.G. Ex Rel. Waite v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Lenhart v. Cigna CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Vaiarella v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API