Legal Opinion

Intermountain Farmers Ass'n v. Fitzgerald

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1978No. 14723PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMER, District Judge:

This case was brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount due on open account for the sale of feed to the defendant in the sum of $41,625.00 with interest and reasonable-attorney’s fees. This is an appeal from a money judgment in favor of the defendant and respondent, (defendant herein) on his counterclaim.

The defendant originally answered the plaintiff’s complaint with a general denial. Some months later the defendant was permitted by the trial court to file an amended answer and counterclaim for alleged injuries and death to defendant’s dairy herd allegedly caused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  2. White v. ShipleyUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Watson Land Co. v. Rio Grande Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Klafta v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Flynn v. WP HARLIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984
  3. Gorostieta v. ParkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Child v. GondaUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hall v. WarrenUtah Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API