Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ford Motor Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1964No. 10024PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff sues for injuries suffered when the parking brake on a Salt Lake City garbage truck he was in charge of suddenly gave way so he was unable to get back into and control it. He alleges that the brake mechanism was defective. On the basis of the depositions of the plaintiff and his coworker Jimmy Jensen, the trial court ruled that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law and granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment.1 Plaintiff appeals.

On summary judgment the adversed party is entitled to have the court survey the *32■evidence and all…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Martin v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Morris v. Farnsworth MotelUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. GIBBS v. Blue Cab, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984
  5. Child v. GondaUtah Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API