Legal Opinion
Gorostieta v. Parkinson
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 2000No. 981741PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice:
T1 Jaime and Marie Gorostieta (the "Go-rostietas"), as guardians ad litem for their daughter Dalinda Gorostieta, appeal from a judgment rendered in regard to their daughter. The Gorostictas argue that the trial court erred in not allowing Marie Gorosticta to testify regarding the amounts contained in medical bills incurred as a result of Dalinda's injury, and also in its ruling regarding jury instructions. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 "We view the facts in the light most favorable to the jury verdict and recite them accordingly." State v. Loose, 2000 UT 11, 1 2, 994…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Wilson v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.