Legal Opinion

Klafta v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1965No. 10275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

The plaintiff sued for injuries suffered when her son’s car, in which she was riding, collided with a cow which had fallen on the highway from the defendant’s truck. The case is here on intermediate appeal to review a ruling of the District Court that the defendant was liable as a matter of law and that the trial should be had on the issue of damages only.

This appeal was granted because the issue presented meets the requirements of Rule 72(b) U.R.C.P. in that the ruling involves substantial rights which will materially affect the final decision and the determination of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Manwill v. OylerUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Intermountain Farmers Ass'n v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Platis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1968
  3. Hyland v. St. Mark's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Benson v. AmesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Louise D. Hansen v. Nicholas Moving & Storage, Inc., Formerly Known as City Transfer & Storage Co., Inc., an Idaho Corporation, and Hughie F. WeighallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API