Legal Opinion

Goforth Properties, Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1984No. 8415SC354PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Summary judgment is properly granted where the moving party establishes a complete defense as a matter of law. Ballinger v. Secretary of Revenue, 59 N.C. App. 508, 296 S.E. 2d 836 (1982), cert. denied, 307 N.C. 576, 299 S.E. 2d 645 (1983). Since the record conclusively shows that plaintiffs are estopped to deny the validity of the Town’s ordinances, summary judgment was properly granted against them on their statutory and constitutional challenges to the ordinances.

It is well established that the acceptance of benefits under a statute or ordinance precludes an attack upon it.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Allred v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Maines v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Franklin Road Properties v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. South Shell Investment v. Town of Wrightsville BeachDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API