Legal Opinion

Trinkley v. Ella Grasso Regional Center

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 7, 1992No. 14303PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The dispositive issue in this administrative appeal is whether an injured state employee, entitled to benefits under General Statutes § 5-142 (a), may also collect “concurrent employment” benefits under General Statutes § 31-310.1 A workers’ compensation commissioner determined that the plaintiff, Kathryn Trinkley (claimant), had suffered a compens*741able work related injury in her primary employment with the named defendant, the Ella Grasso Regional Center (state),2 and was therefore entitled to receive her full salary pursuant to § 5-142 (a). Because the claimant had been concurrently employed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Johnson v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CoventrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Conaci v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API