Trinkley v. Ella Grasso Regional Center
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this administrative appeal is whether an injured state employee, entitled to benefits under General Statutes § 5-142 (a), may also collect “concurrent employment” benefits under General Statutes § 31-310.1 A workers’ compensation commissioner determined that the plaintiff, Kathryn Trinkley (claimant), had suffered a compens*741able work related injury in her primary employment with the named defendant, the Ella Grasso Regional Center (state),2 and was therefore entitled to receive her full salary pursuant to § 5-142 (a). Because the claimant had been concurrently employed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Johnson v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CoventrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Conaci v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.