Legal Opinion
Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 15, 2008No. C-05-00334 RMW, C-05-02298 RMW, C-06-00244 RMWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RAMBUS’S MOTION TO STRIKE; DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT No. 1 OF INVALIDITY; AND STRIKING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT No. 2 OF INVALIDITY
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Rambus has accused the Manufactur ers 1 of infringing various patents. Trial is scheduled for January 19, 2009. Pursuant to a case management deadline for filing summary judgment motions, the Manufacturers have filed two motions for summary judgment of invalidity pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Rambus opposes both motions. Rambus also moves to strike the two motions for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Celeritas Technologies, Ltd., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Plumley v. MockettDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012