Legal Opinion
Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 24, 2008No. C-05-00334 RMW, C-05-02298 RMW, C-06-00244 RMWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RAMBUS’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT
[Re Docket Nos. 503, 505, 506, 507, 509, 510]
[Re Docket No. 355]
[Re Docket Nos. 200, 201]
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Rambus has accused the Manufactur ers 1 of infringing various patents. The court held a two-day claim construction hearing and issued an order interpreting the disputed claim terms. Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc., 569 F.Supp.2d 946 (N.D.Cal.2008). Pursuant to a case management order, Rambus also filed motions for summary judgment of infringement by the Manufacturers’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- ACCO Brands, Inc. v. ABA Locks Manufacturer Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Expanded Metal Products Company v. James KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- California Expanded Metal Products Company v. James KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019