Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 7, 1930No. 13021PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Beease.

As stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Cothran, this is an action on account of the damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant in obstructing a flow of water from Lynch's river in such a way as to flood the storehouse and stock of goods of the plaintiff.

The case was tried before ITon. R. W. Sharkey, Judge of the Civil Court of Florence County, and a jury, which resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $272.00.

There are only two questions raised by the appellant, and they are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schumpert v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Carson v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. Doolittle v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Rinake v. Victor Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  5. Settlemeyer v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Benton Ex Rel. Benton v. PellumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Kennedy v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Culbertson v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. Correll v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Boling v. Woodside Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API