Rinake v. Victor Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Rlugh, J., Spartanburg, July term, 1898. Action for damages by Fred Rinake against Victor Manufacturing Co. From order of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cite: 48 S. C., W5; 53 S. C., 538; 21 S. C., 93. cite: 45 S. C., 282; 19 S. C., 510: 37 S. G, 33: 44 N. Y., 372; 7 111. R., 130; in U. S., 313; 44 Fed. R., 855; 43 S. G, 388.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
The presiding Judge, at the close of the testimony of the plaintiff, granted a nonsuit. The appellant now seeks to reverse the judgment entered upon that nonsuit. If there was any competent testimony material to the plaintiff’s cause of action against the defendant, it was error to' grant the nonsuit.
*180First. What was plaintiff’s cause of action ?
Second. Was there any testimony in support thereof?
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover $12,000 as damages arising from the neglect of the defendant in its duty to the plaintiff as its servant in…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Weaver v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Richardson v. N.W.R. Co. of S.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Wood v. Victor Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.