Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Union Pacific Railroad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that one of the jurors, Sherman Olson, had visited the scene of the accident. The trial court granted the motion. Plaintiff appeals from the order granting a new trial. Defendant cross-appeals assigning as error the denial of its motions for nonsuit, directed verdict and judgment n.o.v.

The facts are as follows. On October 18, 1958, at approximately 8:45 a.m., plaintiff was driving his automobile in a westerly direction on N. E. Halsey street in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Thomas v. DAD'S ROOT BEER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Schneider v. MoeOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Towe v. Sacagawea, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API