Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Moe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The plaintiff, a pedestrian, while walking on the north pedestrian lane crossing Union avenue at its intersection with Frémont street in the city of Portland, was struck and severely injured by an automobile driven by the minor son of the defendant. Traffic at this intersection on both streets is controlled by traffic lights.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for the sum of $7,500 and defendant has appealed.

Upon the trial of the cause in the court below, one Dan Schmiedeberg, a witness for the defendant, testified that he was a part owner of a filling station located on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Litz v. HarmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  3. Harrington v. Worcester, Leicester, & Spencer Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Woodbury v. City of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Peppercorn v. City of Black River FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Middleton v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Thomas v. DAD'S ROOT BEER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API