Legal Opinion
Labotest, Inc. v. Bonta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2002No. 01-56318PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Frank Brown, M.D.,'and Labo-test (collectively “Labotest”) sued the California Department of Health Services (“DHS”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 following DHS’s imposition of administrative sanctions. Prior to trial, the parties entered into two stipulations, the first of which lifted two of the three sanctions, and the judge signed two attached orders, the second of which incorporated the first stipulation into the court’s final order. DHS and Labotest filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the third remaining sanction, which the district court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kilgour v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carbonell v. I.N.S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Labotest, Inc. v. BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hassine v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Bark v. LarsenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- Y.Z. ex rel. Arvizu v. Clark County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.