Legal Opinion
Bark v. Larsen
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 17, 2006No. CV-02-904-HUPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KING, District Judge
The Honorable Dennis J. Hubei, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 9, 2006. Plaintiffs filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982). The matter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- Vega v. GarlandDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023