Legal Opinion
Kilgour v. City of Pasadena
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 1995No. 93-55903PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge:
Kirk Kilgour and the California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Chapter *100950 (collectively, “Kilgour”) filed this .action against the City of Pasadena, Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association, and Bull, Stockwell & Allen (collectively, “the City”) alleging violations of 29 U.S.C. § 794(b), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and various state statutes. The lawsuit settled a week after filing. Upon application for attorney fees, the trial court found that Kilgour’s lawsuit was not a “significant catalyst” in achieving relief.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bennie Cullens, James Gonder, Larry Cooper v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Josefina Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles Ronald BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lillian Corder, Roberta Lombardo v. Brad Gates, Sheriff, and Roy Brown, Lillian Corder Roberta Lombardo v. Brad Gates, Sheriff Roy BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Goehring v. BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Marbley v. BaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Corder v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Cline v. Industrial Maintenance Engineering & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bennett v. YoshinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.