Legal Opinion

Chicago & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. Woodard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1895No. 1,631PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace. The appellee sues to recover of the appellant $113.50 and $25.00 attorney’s fee, for constructing a fence along the appellant’s right-of-way, where it abuts on the appellee’s land. R. S. 1894, section 5324 (Elliott’s Supp., sectoin 1078; Acts 1885, p. 224, section 2). The cause was appealed to the Boone Circuit Court where the venue was changed to the court below. In the trial court the appellant demurred to the complaint which demurrer was overruled and the appellant excepted. This ruling is assigned as error.

A complaint in an action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clifford v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Milhollin v. FullerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Watson v. ConwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Midland Railway Co. v. GaschoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NewsomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Evansville & Indianapolis Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. CroyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API