Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Baker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1899No. 2,814PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The complaint of the appellees against the appellant was in two paragraphs. One of the specifications in the assignment of errors is, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In each paragraph the appellees sought to recover the value of two. steers hilled by a train of cars, in the first paragraph showing that the appellant’s railway was not fenced in at the place where the animals entered upon it, and in the second paragraph proceeding upon the ground of negligence.

There was a special finding of facts with the court’s conclusion of law thereon, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Smith v. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Bump v. McGrannahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Town of Knightstown v. HomerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API