Legal Opinion

Cubic Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 6, 1990No. 604-88CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge.

This is a direct access suit brought under 41 U.S.C. § 605(C)(5). Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that defendant failed to pay interest on its certified claim, submitted as a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) to the contracting officer at the Electronic Systems Division (ESD) of the Air Force on March 28, 1986. This claim as amended was settled for the sum of $10,693,845. Plaintiff’s submission was made pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq. In this case plaintiff seeks $1,956,038, the amount of interest due on the amount paid for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Sun Eagle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. GPA-I, LP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Deponte Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API