Legal Opinion

Progressive Northern Insurance v. Mohr

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 21, 2012No. 243, 2011PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, Justice

(for the majority):

Delaware’s automobile insurance statute requires regulated insurers to offer a minimum amount of insurance on automobiles that are registered in the State.1 On one subject, however, the statute is unclear: must an automobile insurer provide personal injury protection (“PIP”) coverage to an insured where that person is struck in Delaware, as a pedestrian, by a car (the “striking car”) that is insured in Delaware? 2 This case presents that question of first impression.

William Mohr, the plaintiff-below-appel-lee, was struck in Delaware by a car that was insured in Delaware.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. PHL Variable Insurance v. Price Dawe 2006 Insurance Trust Ex Rel. Christiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. CML V, LLC v. BaxSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  5. Taylor v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gerber v. Enterprise Products Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Wyatt v. Rescare Home CareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  3. Zhurbin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Kelley v. Perdue FarmsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Sternberg v. Nanticoke Memorial Hosp., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API