Progressive Northern Insurance v. Mohr
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, Justice
(for the majority):
Delaware’s automobile insurance statute requires regulated insurers to offer a minimum amount of insurance on automobiles that are registered in the State.1 On one subject, however, the statute is unclear: must an automobile insurer provide personal injury protection (“PIP”) coverage to an insured where that person is struck in Delaware, as a pedestrian, by a car (the “striking car”) that is insured in Delaware? 2 This case presents that question of first impression.
William Mohr, the plaintiff-below-appel-lee, was struck in Delaware by a car that was insured in Delaware.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- PHL Variable Insurance v. Price Dawe 2006 Insurance Trust Ex Rel. Christiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- CML V, LLC v. BaxSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Taylor v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gerber v. Enterprise Products Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Wyatt v. Rescare Home CareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Zhurbin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Kelley v. Perdue FarmsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
- Sternberg v. Nanticoke Memorial Hosp., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.