In Matter of Crouch
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
While it is clear from the record that the commitment period of ninety days has expired, this appeal is not moot. See In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E. 2d 409 (1975), and In re Mostella, 25 N.C. App. 666, 215 S.E. 2d 790 (1975).
G.S. 122-58.7(i) provides: “To support a commitment order, the court is required to find, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and imminently dangerous to himself or others. The court shall record the facts which support its findings. (Emphasis added.)” In this case the commitment order is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- In Re MostellaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- In Matter of KoyiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- In re CaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.