Legal Opinion

In Matter of Crouch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1976No. 7527DC644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

While it is clear from the record that the commitment period of ninety days has expired, this appeal is not moot. See In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E. 2d 409 (1975), and In re Mostella, 25 N.C. App. 666, 215 S.E. 2d 790 (1975).

G.S. 122-58.7(i) provides: “To support a commitment order, the court is required to find, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and imminently dangerous to himself or others. The court shall record the facts which support its findings. (Emphasis added.)” In this case the commitment order is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. In Re MostellaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Matter of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. In Matter of KoyiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Matter of JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. In re CaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API