In re Caver

CARLTON, Judge.

In his one assignment of error, respondent contends that the trial court erred in signing and entering the commitment order. Respondent alleges that the evidence presented does not support *266the order. Counsel for respondent concedes that he is unable to find prejudicial error. He submits the record for review by this Court. \

G.S. Section 122-58.1 provides in pertinent part as follows: “Declaration of policy. — It is the policy of this State that no person shall be committed to a mental health facility unless he is mentally ill or an inebriate and imminently dangerous to himself…