Legal Opinion
Bankers Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Bukacek
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 8, 1960No. 7 Div. 371PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
Defendant appeals from judgment for plaintiff entered on a jury verdict in action at law on policy of fire insurance. The policy insures plaintiff “ * * * against all Direct Loss By Fire * * * Except As Hereinafter Provided, to the property described hereinafter * * *,” and further provides:
“This Company shall not be liable for loss by fire * * * caused, directly or indirectly, by: * * * (h) order of any civil authority except acts of destruction at the time of and for the purpose of preventing the spread of fire, provided that such fire did not originate from any of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Fitz Simons & Connell Co. v. Braun & FittsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Belt Automobile Indemnity Ass'n v. Ensley Transfer & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- City of Chicago v. MurdockIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stovall v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Travers v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Giles v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1975
- Milford v. TidwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance v. Contractors Equipment Rental Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.