Legal Opinion

Milford v. Tidwell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1963No. 6 Div. 925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Appeal by fhe defendant from a judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2,100.00. The suit was brought to recover for damages to real property allegedly -sustained through blasting operations conducted by the defendant, in constructing a highway.

The complaint, as drawn in three separate counts, seeks to predicate liability under two theories, i. e., negligence and trespass (absolute or strict liability). All three-counts were submitted to the jury.

Count one, claiming damages and alleging ownership of the real property, sounds in negligence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Ledbetter-Johnson Company v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Snedecor v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Mitchell v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harper v. Regency Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Maples v. Chinese Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Tombrello v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Jefferies v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API