Belt Automobile Indemnity Ass'n v. Ensley Transfer & Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The question of decisive importance presented by the appeal is upon the validity and sufficiency of the estop-pel set up by the plaintiff in its replication to the defendant’s special plea numbered 3.
When an insurance policy contains a general liability clause, followed by a clause or clauses which except specified cases from the operation of the policy, it is not necessary for the complaint to negative the exceptions — their existence being a matter of affirmative defense, as to which the onus of allegation and proof is placed upon the defendant. Standard L. & A. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 94 Ala.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCoy v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Fairbanks Canning Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Goodman v. Georgia Life Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Globe Navigation Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Pacific Nat. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Mooradian v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Geer Bros., Inc. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Palumbo v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Denson v. Kirkpatrick Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.