Lawwill v. Lawwill
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
Did the lower court abuse its discretion in granting a Rule 60(c) motion to amend a divorce decree as to a particular item of personal property? That is the question to be resolved on this appeal.
Briefly, the record reflects the following. In 1971, appellee filed a divorce complaint to which were attached four schedules of property denominated either community or separate. A certain Farny watercolor painting, which is the subject of this appeal, was not specifically described. The complaint, however, referred to Schedule C as descriptive of the community property…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fitzsimons v. FreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Headley v. HeadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Marquam v. SengfelderOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Gordon v. City of Warren Planning & Urban Renewal CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- In re the Will of BurnsideNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- McMillen v. McMillenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Cooper's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Cooper's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Lawwill v. LawwillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.