Legal Opinion

Fitzsimons v. Frey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1950No. 32769PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is a replevin action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover certain personal property, for the purposes of this appeal, described as a pair of candelabra or branch candlesticks. The plaintiff’s amended petition alleges that she is the owner of one pair of large, tall grape candelabra, is entitled to the immediate possession of the same, and that said property is wrongfully and unlawfully detained by the defendant. The defendant’s answer is a general denial. '

The cause was tried to a jury resulting in- a verdict finding that at the commencement of the action the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fritzler v. KeithleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kucaba v. KucabaNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Davis v. SternsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bell's Administratrix v. GoldingIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Shiman Bros. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Danner v. WaltersNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ely Construction Company v. S & CORPORATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ficke v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DrawbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bishop Buffets, Inc. v. Westroads, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API