Cooper's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Simmons
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentHorowitz, J.
(dissenting) — I agree with the majority's conclusion that the Consumer Protection Act is inapplicable to the facts in this case and in the majority's conclusion that, for purposes of RCW 26.16.030(3), a mobile home is not real property requiring joinder of both spouses to transfer community property ownership interest. I must dissent, however, from the majority's interpretation of RCW 26.16.030(5) and its conclusion that the Simmons' mobile home is not a "household good" requiring joinder of both spouses to transfer community property ownership interest. As discussed below, classification of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
- Silver v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Gross v. City of LynnwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.