Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooper's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Simmons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1980No. 46337Published

1DissentHorowitz, J.

(dissenting) — I agree with the majority's conclusion that the Consumer Protection Act is inapplicable to the facts in this case and in the majority's conclusion that, for purposes of RCW 26.16.030(3), a mobile home is not real property requiring joinder of both spouses to transfer community property ownership interest. I must dissent, however, from the majority's interpretation of RCW 26.16.030(5) and its conclusion that the Simmons' mobile home is not a "household good" requiring joinder of both spouses to transfer community property ownership interest. As discussed below, classification of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Silver v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Gross v. City of LynnwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API