Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Burnside

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 28, 1945PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Curtis, S.

By the residuary clause in the decedent’s will, the residue of the estate, after numerous specific legacies were given to her relatives and friends, was divided into thirteen shares, these shares to be distributed among various persons, some to have one-half share, others to have one share, and still others to have two shares. One share was given to Eva Teed Sherwood who died August 24, 1943, prior to the death of the decedent. This legatee was a cousin of the decedent, and hence her legacy is not saved from lapsing by virtue of section 29 of the Decedent Estate Law. The question…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. In Re the Accounting of TamargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Matter of HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Estate of LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goggans v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of MaurerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of MichaelsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  4. Lawwill v. LawwillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. United States v. Julius C. BomarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API