Legal Opinion

Holman v. Pacific Health & Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1995No. 9308-05161; CA A84983Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiff insured appeals from the trial court’s granting of defendant health insurer’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the ensuing judgment in this action for breach of the policy. We reverse and remand with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.

We view the facts favorably to plaintiff, for whom the jury found. In August 1992, plaintiff had a regular semiannual examination with her gynecologist, Dr. Corwin. As a routine part of the examination, a mammogram was performed, and it revealed “an area of increased density in the left breast.” The x-ray report contained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Progressive Specialty Insurance v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API