Legal Opinion

Skiver v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1999No. CR 96-527PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, William Wesley Skiver, was convicated of aggravated robbery and was sentenced as a habitual offender to life in prison. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1996), his attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief stating there is no merit to the appeal. Skiver, pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3 (j), has filed a pro se brief in which he raises arguments for reversal of his conviction. The State agrees that there is no merit to the appeal and recommends that Skiver’s conviction be affirmed. We conclude that there can be no meritorious issue raised from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Finch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. RosarioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Sweet v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API