Hill v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
Appellant Jeffery Hill brings this appeal, claiming that the trial court committed error under the bifurcated sentencing procedures established by Acts 535 and 551 of 1993, as codified in Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-97-101 — 16-97-104 (Supp. 1993).
Hill pleaded guilty to robbery and was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment by a jury impaneled for purposes of sentencing. He raises three points for reversal: (1) the trial court erred in allowing the State to elicit testimony that he had made a prior attempt to commit a robbery against the same victim; (2) the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Grillot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Buckley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.