Legal Opinion

Ex Parte A. Diniaco & Bros.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1922No. 6 Div. 479PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This is a petition for the common-law writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the circuit court awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Gen. Acts 1919, pp. 206-239), and only those errors can be re-, viewed which are apparent upon the record. Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 South. 803.

Subdivision (c) of Section 13 of the act contains the following provisions: ,

“For permanent partial disability the compensation shall be based upon the extent of such disability. * 4 ■ 4 For the loss of un-arm, fifty per centum of the average weekly earnings during two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Ex Parte Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Ex Parte JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Nolan v. Ernest Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API