Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Donnelly
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 21, 1932No. 1169PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
This is a workman’s! compensation case. Donnelly is the injured employee, and Meri-wether was alleged to be the employer, and the Maryland Casualty Company the insurer. Maryland Casualty Company brought the suit to set aside the award of the Industrial Accident Board, and Donnelly reconvened for the compensation alleged to be due him. The verdict of the jury was favorable to the employee, and the insurer appealed.
The appellant contends that the court-should have given an instructed verdict in its behalf because there was no evidence introduced to prove that it was the insurance carrier. After…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Petroleum Casualty Co. v. SealeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. OwenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- King v. GallowayTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. MorenoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Insurors Indemnity & Insurance v. PridgenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Gulf Refining Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Hoover v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Traders & General Ins. v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. AddisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.