Leitch v. State, Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a dismissal of this declaratory judgment proceeding in which he sought judgment, declaring “that no past or future transportation district taxes are due * * * from the plaintiff * * that any taxes that might be due “be satisfied only in accordance” with U.S. Constitution, Art I, § 10, and that ORS ch 267 (Mass Transit Districts) and “succeeding” regulations are unconstitutional and void.
The plaintiff alleged that he was an employer taxed by the Tri-County Metropolitan .Transportation District, and that he tendered payment of the taxes by way of cheeks. Copies of three…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Colton v. CorblySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Allen v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- Rothacker v. Rockwall County Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.