Legal Opinion

Leitch v. State, Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1974No. 33-471PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a dismissal of this declaratory judgment proceeding in which he sought judgment, declaring “that no past or future transportation district taxes are due * * * from the plaintiff * * that any taxes that might be due “be satisfied only in accordance” with U.S. Constitution, Art I, § 10, and that ORS ch 267 (Mass Transit Districts) and “succeeding” regulations are unconstitutional and void.

The plaintiff alleged that he was an employer taxed by the Tri-County Metropolitan .Transportation District, and that he tendered payment of the taxes by way of cheeks. Copies of three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Colton v. CorblySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Allen v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. Rothacker v. Rockwall County Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API