Legal Opinion

City of Colton v. Corbly

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1982No. 13571PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment imposing a permanent mandatory injunction requiring appellant to remove an addition to certain real property located in the city of Colton (appellee). * We affirm.

Appellant, owner of the real estate in question, built an addition on her property without first applying for and receiving a building permit. Appellee’s zoning ordinance, Ordinance 104, requires a building permit as a precondition to construction of such an addition.

Appellant attacks the ordinance as being invalid under the United States Constitution and South Dakota…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. United States v. Marvin Morris WangrudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. State Theatre Co. v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. United States v. RifenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coyote Flats, L.L.C. v. Sanborn County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. City of Brookings v. WinkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Union State Bank v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Fortier v. City of SpearfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API