Spurgeon v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff Gladys L. Spurgeon appeals from an adverse judgment in her action for refund of allegedly overpaid California state income tax. Plaintiff claims that: (1) defendant Franchise Tax Board (hereafter Board) erroneously calculated her income from the sale of an apartment building because it measured her capital gain in terms of “dollars,” without compensating for the dollar’s declining purchasing power; (2) the Board, as a creature of the state, is required by the federal Constitution to measure capital gain with reference to the value of gold or silver coin (see U.S.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Title Insurance. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- J. H. McKnight Ranch, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Baird v. County AssessorsUtah Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.