Legal Opinion

Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1994No. S036526Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 Cal.4th 161 (1994)

885 P.2d 934

36 Cal. Rptr.2d 521

DOMAR ELECTRIC, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent; BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY, Intervener and Respondent.

Docket No. S036526.

Supreme Court of California.

December 28, 1994.

COUNSEL

Kamine, Steiner & Ungerer, Bernard S. Kamine and Phyllis M. Ungerer for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Pedro B. Echeverria, John F. Haggerty and Christopher M. Westhoff, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney (San Francisco), Mara E. Rosales, Joseph S. Avila,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API