Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
Aria Diagnostics, Inc., now known as Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. (Ariosa) sought a declaration that its Harmony test did not infringe any claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,540 (the '540 patent), owned by defendant Isis Innovation Limited (Isis) and licensed by Isis exclusively to Sequenom, Inc. (Sequenom). Sequenom counterclaimed, alleging that Ariosa’s Harmony test infringes the '540 patent. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.