Legal Opinion
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 12, 2015No. 2014-1139, 2014-1144PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1373Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. Concurring Opinion file by Circuit Judge LINN.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a grant of summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,540 (“the '540 patent”). The United States District Court for the Northern District of California found that the asserted claims of the '540 patent are not directed to patent eligible subject matter and are therefore invalid under 85 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.'
I
In 1996, Drs. Dennis Lo and James Wainscoat discovered cell-free fetal DNA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Paula Leever v. Carson, City of Consolidated Municipality of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Bsg Tech LLC v. Buyseasons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Chargepoint, Inc. v. Semaconnect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.