Legal Opinion
Naegele v. Albers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2003-2507PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff Timothy D. Naegele (“Plaintiff’ or “Naegele”) is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing as to why the Court should not STAY this action in its entirety pending the resolution of parallel and/or overlapping California state court litigation surrounding the same fee dispute at the center of this action. Plaintiff shall also SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not find that he “willfully fail[ed] to appear at the arbitration hearing” before the Los Angeles Bar Association’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013