Legal Opinion
Naegele v. Albers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 23, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2003-2507PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Timothy D. Naegele brought this diversity action against Deanna J. Alb-ers and Raymond H. Albers (“the Albers defendants”), former defendant Lloyd J. Michaelson, 1 and unnamed individuals “Does 1-10” (“the Doe defendants”), asserting thirteen common law claims sounding in contract and tort.2d Am. Compl. [Dkt. # 109]. The Albers defendants have moved to dismiss, contending that several of plaintiffs claims are barred by res judi-cata in light of the decision of the California Court of Appeals in Albers v. Naegele, No.…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dyson v. Dutko Ragen Homes & Investments, Kw UnitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Inyangette v. BowserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Nuevos Destinos, LLC v. PeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Scps, LLC v. Kind LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025