Legal Opinion
Brunsoman v. Seltz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1987No. C5-87-1006PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Jerry Brunsoman, having previously obtained a judgment against the limited partnership of which Douglas Seitz was general partner, brought this action to enforce that judgment against Douglas Seitz. Although the case had been scheduled for trial, the trial court entered judgment for Brunsoman on the basis of the records and arguments of the parties. From that judgment, and the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial, Seitz appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
The underlying facts of this action are set forth in Brunsoman v. Lexington-Silverwood, 385 N.W.2d 823…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Louis J. Detrio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Valley National Bank v. A.E. Rouse & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sondel v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State v. VictorsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Faber v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. WaterhouseDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.