Legal Opinion
Valley National Bank v. A.E. Rouse & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1997No. 96-15993PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
The Valley National Bank of Arizona obtained a default judgment in Arizona state court against the Varga Group, an Arizona general partnership. The Bank brought this suit to enforce its judgment against two general partners in the Varga Group, A.E. Rouse & Company and B.M. Rouse & Company, both Wyoming partnerships, and those partnerships’ general partners. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The Bank appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
In 1985, the Varga Group, an Arizona general partnership…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Hosseinzadeh v. M.R.S. Associates, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Brawders v. County of Ventura (In Re Brawders)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Khan v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Grove v. De La CruzDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- County of Ventura Tax Collector v. Brawders (In Re Brawders)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.