Legal Opinion
A.E. Finley & Associates, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1990No. 13-1892PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that the United States had activated the contract dispute resolution mechanism of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq., and had exhausted its administrative and judicial remedies regarding the dispute. The district court denied relief. The United States, while defending the court’s decision on the merits, argues as it did below that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. We conclude that the district court had jurisdiction, and we shall affirm the court’s judgment on the merits.
I
Rust Engineering Company, acting for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Amoco Production Company v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of Department of the Interior, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Maria Muniz-Muniz v. United States Border PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Movant-Appellant v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Consolidated Edison v. U.S. Dept., EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Rollock Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.