Legal Opinion
Rollock Company v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 28, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00245PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
The dispute in this case is over terms of a property acquisition and relocation contract between the government and the plaintiffs, the Rollock Company, Anthony Kordell, and Christopher Kordell (collectively “the Rollock plaintiffs” or “Rollock”). The National Park Service (“NPS”) purchased land owned by the Rollock plaintiffs for the Flight 93 National Memorial, land on which Rollock operated a scrap metal recycling facility. Compl. ¶¶ 2, 9. 1 In contemplation of the land purchase, the contract between the parties provided for: (1) the sale of business scrap…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fredericks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Florida Home Medical Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.