Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Stein

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1894No. 17,052PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— The appellee was a brakeman on one of appellant’s freight trains, and has brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have resulted from the failure of appellant to furnish safe appliances for the performance of his duties as such brakeman. The car upon which appellee was injured was loaded with heavy stone, and was, at the time, detached from the engine in order to be run in upon a switch. The engine passed the switch and then stood upon the track, while the switch was opened to allow the car upon which appellee stood to enter the switch. It was, however, then discovered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. City of Indianapolis v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Vandalia Coal Co. v. YemmIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Oölitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HensleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API