Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lutz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2001PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Chad Lutz, asks us to examine whether he is entitled to expungement of charges included in his criminal information, which the Commonwealth agreed to dismiss as part of a negotiated plea bargain in exchange for his guilty plea to one count of aggravated assault. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, Appellant is not entitled to expungement of the dismissed charges. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decision to deny Appellant the relief he requested.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows. On March 28, 1998, the victim…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. WexlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. V.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. A.M.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. HannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API